A TV ad for durex Play O, a gel for women, depicted the
facial expressions of a number of women who were experiencing sexual ecstasy
but who appeared to be singing an aria. The ad closed with a pack shot while
the voice-over said "Feel like never before. durex Play O. Pleasure
enhancing gel for women. durex play. All you need".
The ad was cleared by Clearcast with a post-11pm timing restriction.
The ad was cleared by Clearcast with a post-11pm timing restriction.
Channel 4 explained that the ad had been broadcast after
10pm during Gordon Ramsey's F Word and during Derren Brown Presents the 3D
Magic Spectacular. They said their aim was not to offend viewers, and they took
measured decisions when deciding to schedule ads outside of Clearcast's
recommendations.
Channel 4 explained that in scheduling the Durex ad before
the recommended 11pm restriction, they had taken into account the subject
matter and content of the programmes, as well as their audience index. They
considered that Gordon Ramsey's F Word was of an adult nature, containing
strong language and sexual innuendo, and that viewers of that programme would
not be offended by the ad. Channel 4 provided audience index figures for both
programmes.
Not upheld
The ASA noted that the viewers saw the ad after 10pm but
were of the opinion that it was unsuitable for broadcast at any time. We
acknowledged the viewers' concern, and appreciated that advertisers and
broadcasters needed to be aware of the sensitive nature of ads for this type of
product. We considered that this ad was not overtly graphic, contained no
explicit material and was unlikely to cause offence, provided it was scheduled
appropriately.
We understood that the post-11pm scheduling restriction
applied by Clearcast would have helped to avoid exposure to viewers under the
age of 12 years. We noted, however, that Channel 4 had broadcast the ad shortly
after 10pm in the first instance and shortly after 10.30pm in the second
instance. We checked the audience index figures for those ad breaks in the
relevant programmes, and noted that they did not attract a significant
proportion of younger viewers, and concluded that neither programme had
demonstrated a particular appeal to younger children.
Although the ad was broadcast by Channel 4 earlier than
Clearcast's scheduling advice, in consideration of the child audience index
figures for the ad breaks and surrounding programmes, we considered that it had
been scheduled appropriately and was unlikely to cause offence to viewers.
We investigated the ad under CAP (Broadcast) TV Advertising
Standards Code rule 6.1 (Offence) and 7.4.7 (Use of scheduling restrictions)
and Rules on the Scheduling of Television Advertisements rule 4.1.1 (Particular
separation of advertisements and programmes and 4.2.3 (Treatments unsuitable
for children) but did not find it in breach.
No comments:
Post a Comment